On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 00:07 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > Il 26/03/2010 00:02, Ng Oon-Ee ha scritto: > > Repository : extra > > Name : gsfonts > > Version : 1.0.7pre44-1 > > Installed : 8.11-5 > > URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/ > > > > I'm assuming this is a simple mess upstream on non-consecutive version > > numbers? The linked sourceforge page still lists 8.11 as the stable > > version, while the one currently in extra is listed as 'pre' (and > > doesn't seem available in the sourceforge page? > > > > I guess that maintainer forgotten the force option. > svn log message says "Use newer version of the fonts as provided by > Fedora's package urw-fonts Fixes FS#10593" > > Yes, that seems to be what has happened. Should this be handled by updating gsfonts (to pkgrel 2 with appropriate force options) or by announcement? Seems the gsfonts package is 'dead' upstream? And we're now taking from Fedora's package? Or development simply moved there?
