Re: Ignoring packages and piecemeal updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Denis Kobozev <d.v.kobozev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Isaac Dupree
> <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> NixOS does better
>> (at least at the theoretical stuff, though it has fewer users..it was born
>> in academia..Basically it is archtected so that you can have multiple
>> versions of any package installed and they inherently won't conflict with
>> each other.).
>
> Interesting. Judging from a quick glance at the NixOS homepage, nix
> deals with shared dependencies by having very precise rules about
> which package requires which versions of shared libraries. So when a
> new version of libfoo comes out, all packages that depend on libfoo
> should be rebuilt. If package maintainers are lazy, you would end up
> with a system where each package has its own version of libfoo...

GoboLinux does something similar in that packages are installed to
some place in a directory named packagename-version/ and then things
are symlinked in.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux