Re: Arch Linux security is still poor....

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tuesday 16 Mar 2010 2:59:45 am Allan McRae wrote:


> 
> As an aside, I would like to see some numbers on where we could improve
> in this area.  I have been following the CVE announcements and several
> other distros security releases for the past few months and from what I
> see, I believe Arch is mostly ahead of the game.  Following the latest
> upstream releases has its advantages.
> 
> Allan
Hi Allan,
The major thing we are missing on is: Package signing 
It there is a need to catch up with other distros on this.
Package signing is extremely important to ensure that nobody can tamper the 
packages. similarly should be way to  package's integrity

-- 
Regards,
Gaurish Sharma
www.gaurishsharma.com


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux