Re: Btrfs more than twice as fast compared to ext4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Btrfs more than twice as fast compared to ext4
From: Nilesh Govindarajan <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:31:27 +0530
In-reply-to: <201003130835.18547.ghodechhap@ghodechhap.net>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Shredder/3.0.3

On 03/13/2010 08:35 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:

Hi,

Just wanted to share an interesting experience I had today.

Check http://ghodechhap.net/btrfs.performance.txt


Great. A stable version released ?

--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site & Server Adminstrator
www.itech7.com

References:
- Btrfs more than twice as fast compared to ext4
  - From: Shridhar Daithankar

Prev by Date: Re: Bad attitude in flyspray again!
Next by Date: Re: pdftk - almost build but died - need help figuring out if I can find a work-around
Previous by thread: Btrfs more than twice as fast compared to ext4
Next by thread: Re: Btrfs more than twice as fast compared to ext4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux