Re: Bad attitude in flyspray again!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Heiko Baums <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:58:34 -0600
> schrieb Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> So you wanted to add a comment totally unrelated to the bug itself to
>> the bug? Isn't that polluting the bug report? What happened here is
>> exactly what I'd expect - you contacted the developer.
>
> No, this is related to the bug, because it was the same bug, only for a
> different package version. And such an information or the request for
> this information (the other bug's number) should be added to the
> comments, so that other people who've got this issue, too, and only
> find this closed bug can find the current open bug report. Otherwise
> everyone would need to contact the developer directly by e-mail which
> could be much more annoying for the developer than one or two
> additional comments to the closed bug report and wouldn't help other
> people.

See the bug referenced and the final comment in the bug. It links to
two upstream bug reports


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux