On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Florian Pritz <bluewind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09.03.2010 14:37, Ionut Biru wrote: >> On 03/09/2010 03:17 PM, Florian Pritz wrote: >>> On 09.03.2010 02:20, keenerd wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:13:38 -0600, Dan McGee<dpmcgee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote >>>>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, keenerd<keenerd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> There does not seem to be a documented "standard rsync" command for >>>>>> the mirrors to use, so I'm making all sorts of wild assumptions about >>>>>> what a mirror's rsync is doing. >>>>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Local_Mirror#The_synchronization_script >>>> >>>> >>>> The real mirrors use that too? The whole "local mirror" title kind of >>>> threw me. I was looking at >>>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:NewMirrors . My >>>> bad. >>>> >>> >>> Afaik not every mirror uses that script and it's quite hard to reach all >>> the admins because there is no mailinglist (though I've heared it's >>> going to be set up). >>> >> >> are you taking from your experience or you did find a mirror that does >> store old packages? afaik only kernel.org mirror does that but they were >> contacted. >> > > <Romashka> I'm trying to force all admins to use the same rsync options > > Though that's from February and I don't what's the current status. > > Multi tier mirroring is being done atm and I've edited the mirror script > from the wiki to fetch only checksums and thus being able to run every > minute which would greatly increase the distribution speed, but I still > have to test for bugs. If anyone wants to help: > http://karif.server-speed.net/~flo/tmp/mirrorsync.sh.txt We're bandwidth and rsync-slot constrained, not "slow at distribution". It seems like this solution is not solving a problem we currently have... -Dan
