forwarded to arch-general ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] monotone needs botan 1.8.x Date: Friday 05 March 2010, 17:48:28 From: Marq Schneider <queueram@xxxxxxxxx> To: Allan McRae <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@xxxxxxxxx> I'm emailing you guys directly since i don't think i have access to this mailing list. On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 08:34, Allan McRae <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Looking at the release notes, monotone appears to ship with an internal version of botan. > Can you just use that rather than making an additional package? I have never heard of or seen this in the monotone source. If you want to build botan 1.8.x and statically link it in as part of the monotone PKGBUILD. See my attached PKGBUILD on FS as an example (the 2nd one) [0] On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 08:34, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think I dragged this into the repos a few years ago when it appeared > it might become one of the big DVCS tools. This one stayed under the > radar compared to git and mercurial, however. Pidgin does use it for > what it is worth to manage their codebase. I've been following this discussion on arch-dev-public and the FS [0]. I work on pidgin from time to time, so this is a must have for me to continue development. I wanted to ask: why did botan get updated to using the development (1.9.x) branch instead of the stable (1.8.x) branch? Arch jumped from 1.8.5 to 1.9.3 back in November. I am all for keeping packages up-to-date, but i am not sure that i agree with hopping to the development branch. I don't follow the botan mailing list at all, but the stable branch is still worked on (now up to 1.8.8). If nothing requires 1.9.x, would it do any harm to revert botan to 1.8.x? Regards, Marq [0] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17297 [1] http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/botan/trunk/PKGBUILD?op=log&rev=0&isdir=0 ----------------------------------------- -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
