Re: [arch-dev-public] Versioned dependency fun...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. März 2010 14:06:57 schrieb Dan McGee:
>> > and here we have another reason to punish anybody using versioned
>> > dependencies. ;-) (of course upstream needs to be hit, too)
>>
>> Blaming this on versioned deps is punishing the messenger; this
>> package wouldn't upgrade without a force option either because the
>> same version comparison is used everywhere...
>
> You did notice the smiley? I know this wasn't fair in this case and not too
> serious. But anyway, I would prefer add the force flag and add the (stupid)
> upstream version instead of making your own up.
>

The force flag is a big ugly crap.
I find sanitizing upstream version to be much.. saner.
Or figure out a way to have both a sane version for pacman and the
insane upstream version.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux