Re: [arch-dev-public] Samba package sizes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Am Samstag 27 Februar 2010 schrieb Xavier Chantry:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Rogutės Sparnuotos
> 
> <rogutes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Dan McGee (2010-02-26 19:09):
> >> Guys, does anyone else think this is getting out of hand?
> > 
> > <...>
> > 
> >> Seriously, 45 f-ing MB for samba? How can that be possible?
> > 
> > <...>
> > 
> > Samba is growing up fast.
> > It is long known upstream ( http://bugs.debian.org/474543 ) and already
> > anecdotal: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-December/152549.html
> 
> I just read the debian bug, it would be interesting to have a status
> update after one year :
> 1) there was a big size increase between 3.0 and 3.2 , how does
> 3.4(.6) compare to that ?
> 2) whats up with the librpc/gen_ndr "Patches welcome" ?
Keep in mind 3.5.x will be release on monday, probably.
greetings
tpowa
-- 
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tpowa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux