On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 17:32, André Ramaciotti <andre.ramaciotti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Andre Ramaciotti < > andre.ramaciotti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Celti <celticmadman@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:38, Andre Ramaciotti >> > <andre.ramaciotti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Celti <celticmadman@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> >> >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:23, Celti <celticmadman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 15:19, Andre Ramaciotti >> >>>> <andre.ramaciotti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>>> Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@xxxxxxxxx <daenyth%2Barch@xxxxxxxxx>> >> writes: >> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 16:34, Andre Ramaciotti >> >>>>>> <andre.ramaciotti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>>>>> as in "they don't show any keycode >> >>>>>>> on 'xev' or 'showkey'". >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> It sounds like those keys are broken. It should be sending >> something. Is it old? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> It's barely used. I don't think the keys are broken, most probably, >> >>>>> these keys send the "I've been pressed" signal in a non-standard way >> >>>>> (you know, it's Microsoft, it wouldn't surprise me at all). I >> suspect >> >>>>> this because this keyboard comes with an installation CD, which >> probably >> >>>>> contains some kind of special driver (for Windows and Mac OS X only). >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Likely they don't have a kernel mapping, so X doesn't even see them. >> >>>> You'll need to get their scancodes with `showkeys`, and map them to >> >>>> keycodes with `setkeycodes`, while out of X. >> >>>> >> >>>> ~celti >> >>> >> >>> Er, sorry, I'm blind. You said you used showkey. Did you try it with >> '-s'? >> >> >> >> Yay! It did return some key codes, though they were kind of strange, >> >> like a single key printing '0xe0 0x5d' (instead of a single byte). Will >> >> I have any problems because of this? >> > >> > Nope. Those are scancodes, not keycodes. There are plenty of howtos >> > out there on mapping scancodes to keycodes; it's been long enough >> > since I've needed to that I've forgotten the exact syntax. >> > >> > Glad I could help. >> > >> > ~celti >> >> I'm glad, too. Thank you! :) >> > > Actually... I should pay more atention to what I'm doing. I've just > realized that I was pressing the wrong key; I was pressing one by the side > of the key that doesn't produces any code. They key I should be pressing > still doesn't show anycode when running showkey as `showkey -s`. Oh. In that case, it probably does use some silly proprietary Microsoft thing. No idea how to help there, sorry. ~celti