Re: Planet Arch Linux atom feed.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Planet Arch Linux atom feed.
From: Damjan Georgievski <gdamjan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:09:56 +0100
In-reply-to: <d64a48981002201822i3c623278q3081d1d46623f96d@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Ah but google reader additions of the offending feeds seem to work
> fine. They link through properly. Our planet feed does not. Hmm...

http://validator.w3.org/feed/


-- 
damjan

References:
- Planet Arch Linux atom feed.
  - From: gt
- Re: Planet Arch Linux atom feed.
  - From: Aaron Griffin
- Re: Planet Arch Linux atom feed.
  - From: gt
- Re: Planet Arch Linux atom feed.
  - From: Allan McRae
- Re: Planet Arch Linux atom feed.
  - From: Aaron Griffin

Prev by Date: Re: powertop vs archlinux vs ubuntu
Next by Date: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mkinitcpio 0.6.3-1
Previous by thread: Re: Planet Arch Linux atom feed.
Next by thread: [signoff] pciutils-3.1.7-1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux