On Friday 05 February 2010 14:08:11 David C. Rankin wrote: > Looking at the processes, it is 'virtuoso -t' that is to blame. Can anyone > else confirm this behavior ... and .. does anyone know of a workaround? Disble nepomuk? -- Regards Shridhar
On Friday 05 February 2010 14:08:11 David C. Rankin wrote: > Looking at the processes, it is 'virtuoso -t' that is to blame. Can anyone > else confirm this behavior ... and .. does anyone know of a workaround? Disble nepomuk? -- Regards Shridhar