On 2 February 2010 13:43, Ty John <ty-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:13:38 -0600 > "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 02/01/10 21:59, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: >> > Well, Arch is rolling release distro, I agree. Arch rocks. But only >> > one thing. pacman should support installing multiple kernels. >> > Developers need not maintain the old version. Let it be in the >> > cache of the user. But pacman should not remove the older one after >> > upgrade. >> > >> >> >> I 2nd that motion .... >> >> > > As previously mentioned, that is what the user's local cache is for. Urmm..if it is so important, Arch gives you the power to roll your own kernel. Heck, I don't even have a fallback, because I don't need it. Like Fons, I have an RT kernel, and a normal kernel. Either acts as a backup of the other, since neither gets updated along with the other. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
