On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Ananda Samaddar <mr.a.samaddar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:14:18 -0600 > Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Daenyth Blank >> >> Don't forget: everyone is interested in "starting discussions" or >> "planning" or "drawing up plans", but when it comes to the actual work >> well, then the original initiators get disinterested. It's as if the >> problem is purely academic and all that's needed is a solution and >> things will simply get implemented. > > I'm surmising that this has happened before. My solution to the > 'security issue' would be administrative rather than technical to allay > the fears of one poster who didn't want Arch to get overly > complicated. I'm going to work on processes that a security team > would need to follow when a security issue is disclosed. I'll post > that here when it's done for discussion and comments so others can > contribute. I've been mulling this over for a long time and I want to > make my favourite distro even better. > > regards, > > Ananda Samaddar > Search the wiki for "security", you'll see what others have attempted to do.
