On 01/31/2010 04:24 PM, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > 2010/2/1, fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> Pacman did *not* tell him this was just a rename. >> > pacman just ask him if he wants to replace kernel-headers by > api-headers, but it's obvious that software has been renamed or > replaced by another one. > If you dislike that behaviour, please send a request to pacman-dev ML. > > The difference between replaced and renamed is significant though. There's no reason not to replace kernel-headers with linux-api-headers, but there are some other packages (cdrtools vs cdrkit comes to mind) that would give the same message but have a very different effect. Just my 2 cents. -Brendan Long
