2010/1/31 Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > virus_found <vir.found@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Now you know about several of those cases, for I wasn't able to burn my >> CD on a modern device (Lenovo SL500's DVD device) with cdrtools >> (alpha67, IIRC), but I was able to do it with >> cdrkit without an issue. > > There is a 99.999999999% chance that you are not telling the truth. > > If you really had a problem, you could describe it and send a log. > People who have problems have a name and send bug reports. Ok, I didn't want to take part in this joke, but enough is enough. There is a 99.999999999% chance that you are not telling the truth. If you really had a relevant e-mail from Eben Moglen (or another lawyer, for the matter) that could really solve all of your problems with the cdrtools-vs-cdrkit querelle, you would have found a way to publish it and clear up the doubts. People who have problems have a name (ok, you have one) and send bug (law) reports. This is *your* argument. Do you think it is valuable? Ok, I'll just say I have *two* private e-mails from a very important lawyer that states that there *is* a legal problem with cdrtools. Now, how do you counter-argument *this*? Do you see how it makes no sense at all? You know what's the point? I had a deep respect for you, before I read this thread. Maybe you're the best coder in the world, but it's decades that code doesn't earn you respect. You are talking with *people* here, not pets. And your discussion is in no way technical as you required. «My software has legal issues? No, that's not true, trust me, I can't provide any proof but it's true.» «My software has technical issues? No, that's not true, I can't trust you and you must provide proof.» No, thanks. Corrado Primier
