Re: An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Gaurish Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
> Leaving all the licenses and legal issues aside,
> 
> Q) Which is better out of the two?
> 
> please respond purely on technical basis.

A) cdrtools, period. Especially if you try to burn DVDs with long, non-
ascii (read 'utf8') filenames, labels and other "weird" stuff.

I had lost quite a few DVDs in the past before I remembered that it was 
cdrkit the burner and not cdrtools.

But, the developer of cdrtools... that's another story. In this thread 
alone, he's been asked at least twice why he doesn't dual-license cdrtools 
and he conveniently ignored it.


Herr Schilling, why don't you dual-license (or, best, single-license to 
GPL) cdrtools?



-- 
X.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux