Re: An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Jan de Groot <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 10:29 -0200, Johann Peter Dirichlet wrote:
> > Well, there are some lawyer we can just consult to put a thombstone on
> > this discussion? It will going to nowhere if we can't do this single
> > "clearing" of legal issues. In fact, this is the only hurdle to put
> > cdrtools in [community] repo (well, someone needs to adopt it, too).
>
> Seems that won't happen, because:
> - this discussion comes up now and then, I've seen exactly the same
> discussion on the fedora-legal lists without outcome
> - the anti-cdrtools people state that CDDL and GPL are incompatible,
> some have lawyers who back that statement

Just to make it clear:

There is not a single claim from a lawyer that confirms the claims from
the hostile downstram packager.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       js@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                (uni)  
       joerg.schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux