On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Marco <domanov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Yeah, we're killing off klibc, as it's largely unmaintained. We're >>> switching to actually using glibc and busybox. > > Did you mean ulibc? No, not uClibc either. We're actually using glibc itself. Other distros do this as well, as it DOES add a lot of flexibility
