On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:01:09 +0530 Nilesh Govindarajan <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/20/2010 08:44 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0100 > > Philipp Überbacher<hollunder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> The only drawback right now is that sup is still > >> very young, it has its quirks. Never the less it's the best mail > >> client I've used so far (used only claws mail before), especially > >> when it comes to reading and searching and I don't regret that I > >> switched. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Philipp > >> > > > > i'm also using claws. the biggest thing that bothers me about it is > > not enough customisation options, no event system, no easily > > scripting things inside it (they are working on an events system > > but it supports only 3 events now afaik, and you can spawn external > > scripts with keybinds but it's hard to modify the behavior or state > > of claws from external scripts). one of the many examples: I want > > to be able to change html/image viewing settings depending on > > sender address or open mailbox. > > > > any thoughts on those things re: sup and claws? > > > > Dieter > > Thunderbird 3 is also good. Thunderbird by default bottom posts (it > can be changed though). > thunderbird doesn't offer any of the things I'm looking for (see above), is bloat and makes a mess in its user's $HOME. Dieter
