On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jim Pryor > <lists+arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:52:38AM -0600, Dan McGee wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Heiko Baums <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > >>> > I again answer to arch-general due to write permissions. >>> > >>> >>> You realize you don't need to say this *every single time* you answer >>> an email from arch-dev-public? We do this (restrict who can post to >>> that list) quite on purpose, and this is the defined method of >>> answering these emails. Every dev subscribes to this list too so it >>> isn't like your email is getting lost. >> >> Hi Dan, I didn't know that either. I've several times wanted to reply to >> arch-dev-public emails and didn't know how. It's helpful to hear this is >> the expected protocol, thanks. > > It used to (not sure if the message has changed) indicate this in the > error response when trying to post to arch-dev-public. Something to > the effect of "please send your reply to arch-general" On that note, sorry for being a bit blunt as I thought it was more widely known. I guess now it is. :) -Dan
