On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 2:47 AM, David C. Rankin <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > All depends on what the ultimate goals for the distro are. Me? I wouldn't > change a thing. I like Arch the way it is and I hope it stays like this > until I'm old and gray (sh... I'm getting there ;-) > > I don't think Arch should try to keep up with the Jones' or worry about what > distro watch says. But, in the alternative, if the goal is to see just how > far and how widely accepted Arch can become in hopes of selling out to > someone like Novell, Corel, etc.., then it might make sense to look a bit > harder at what makes the rating meter tick. > > Personally, I don't think all the money in the world would be worth > sacrificing the niche Arch has carved out for itself in the Linux > community... I agree completely, and that's really what I was trying to get at by posing that question
