Myles Green wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:40:24 -0600
Jonathan Temple <jontemple@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:50 PM, David C. Rankin
<drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Seriously, I like the Arch installer just fine, but I can tell you
that the Ubuntu/SuSE install rating most likely come from the fact
that the gui installers they employ are easy on the eye and they
have put a lot of effort into automating the difficult parts of the
install procedure that most new users don't understand --> the
partitioning.
This begs the question: does arch really want users who can't get
through the current installer? Isn't the user base Arch Linux is
catering to one that /should/ understand this?
+1
- --
Myles Green
Linux. It isn't about it being free,
it's about the freedom it brings.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAksrYckACgkQ1TmPUtHwHkey+wCdF1KXP5jVTkjVobtNf0qn4Dq8
3KEAmgMZYJDPmRD86BNoDkGlXVeZPonU
=Gpdm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Good thing you signed that message... it would be a shame if we did not
know that "+1" was definitely from you.
Allan
