On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 14:40 +0500, Vasiliy Kurdin wrote: > 2009/12/8 Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@xxxxxxxxx> > > > On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 09:02 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > > Ng Oon-Ee schrieb: > > > > On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 07:13 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > > >> Ng Oon-Ee schrieb: > > > >>> Hi all, I've been holding the mkinitcpio package due to > > > >>> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15240 > > > >>> > > > >>> A quick look into testing shows that I won't be able to update the > > > >>> 2.6.32 kernel due to dependencies on klib invalidating my 'old' > > > >>> mkinitcpio package. Unfortunately I'm stuck here, since without this > > > >>> 'old' package for mkinitcpio (0.5.24-1) I'm unable to resume from > > > >>> hibernate in tuxonice. > > > >> Just replace the resume hook. The klibc stuff from testing will not > > move > > > >> to core anyway, so that doesn't matter either. > > > >> > > > > Replacing the resume hook sounds okay, as per wiki? So there's no plans > > > > to patch mkinitcpio as it currently is, for tuxonice support? > > > > > > > > > > There are, there is just the slight time issue, if anyone can send a > > > patch, it would be most convenient. > > > > > Thanks for clarification. The wiki states that these two lines should be > > added to /lib/initcpio/hooks/resume > > > > resumedevice=${resume#*:} > > resumedevice=${resumedevice%:*} > > > > Would that be 'patch' enough? > > > > > I have tried that 'patch' from wiki, but it didn't help me. > Fixed for you, please don't top-post. And yes, I can't seem to get that to work. Would assume there's just something not matching in the checks. Anyone have any ideas on getting tuxonice working with latest mkinitcpio?