Re: [OT] What is wrong with DBus anyway?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 10:55:32PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:11:08 +0100
> schrieb fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> 
> > It is not beside the point. To create a new tab, just provide
> > a 'New Tab' button. Or have tabs from the start and label the
> > next free one '+'. It doesn't require IPC at all.
> 
> You're not forced to using gedit.

THAT is completely irrelevant. I never claimed
to be forced to use it. 

The point is that you can allow a user to have multiple
tabs by providing an interface to request a new tab.
This still leaves the user the choice not to have new
tab by starting a new instance instead of using the 
new tab option. Providing this does not require IPC.

Instead of this, you prefer to limit the user's choice
by creating a new tab even if the user starts a new
instance. This removes a valuable choice.

What is the rationale for doing this ? What is the
rationale for forcing a single instance, apart from
having a reason to use IPC ? 

Ciao,

-- 
FA

Wie der Mond heute Nacht aussieht !
Ist es nicht ein seltsames Bild ?


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux