Re: [OT] What is wrong with DBus anyway?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



2009/12/4 Arvid Picciani <aep@xxxxxxxx>:
> http://blogs.igalia.com/itoral/2006/03/30/adding-dbus-support-to-gedit/
>
> priceless finding.
>
> let me sum up:
> "
> - There is feature X which works very well
> - He discovered it doesn't use dbus.
> - He starts work on a very complicated patch that makes it use dbus.

As I understand it, the complexity was related to the fact that GEdit
didn't had DBus support. Of course the first patch will be "complex"
and replace a "working functionality", but for now on, GEdit can
expose events and functions to _any_ other application through DBus.
Just because nobody is using right now, doesn't mean that it will
never be useful.

-- 
A: Because it obfuscates the reading.
Q: Why is top posting so bad?

-------------------------------------------
Denis A. Altoe Falqueto
-------------------------------------------


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux