Jan de Groot wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 19:45 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
nope. The hal crap has been added to X a while ago as "optional"
(meaning X would just freeze without it, but at least pretend to
start)
, but the forced dependency is new (as in, it doesnt start when
compiled
with hal, but no hal present).
The difference is that previously you could get get away with a hack
in
xorg.conf without having to rebuild xorg without --enable-config-hal
Looks like nobody ever reads documentation. Read the freaking wiki link
posted when upgrading/installing xorg-server and you'll know you can
disable hal interaction from xorg.conf with one single option. Is it
that hard?
hah there he is seeking the frontal battle.
counter point: Looks like no one ever reads mails completely before
assuming the other side is a complete moron.
Where did i say i have a problem related to that upgrade?
In fact, let me requote that to prove you didnt read it.
> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 19:45 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
>> The difference is that previously you could get get away with a hack
>> in xorg.conf
Jan de Groot wrote:
> and you'll know you can
> disable hal interaction from xorg.conf with one single option.
Thanks for being so smart and education me though!
--
Arvid
Asgaard Technologies
