Re: usable browser?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Tobias Kieslich wrote:
dillo, simplistic, bone simple, limitations on the functionality
Bottomline, if you need the features live with the overload. In Linux
there are three full featured rendering engines:
- gecko
- webkit
- opera
you ruled out all of them, so what's left has serious short comings.

	-T
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Arvid Picciani wrote:
for those who don't want to read my long text completely here a
short version:

- no webkit ( i need to visit non w3c compliant sites )
- no gecko  ( i don't have a raid11 in my laptop )
- no opera  ( i hate popups )
- no chrome ( unusable buggy )

what is left?
thanks

Seamonkey is quite fast. Although I am not using it now I have in the past and I know it is used extensively in Puppylinux because it is full featured and light weight, even including a mail client.

Since it is developed by Mozilla it is very similar to FF in functionality but does not have all the extras that slow FF down. I agree that FF has gotten very bloated in the last few years, I think to compete with and explorer and make windows users happy. But as a result the browser is not what it used to be.

I currently use chrome both on windows and in Arch and it runs the fastest of any others for me.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux