Re: Frustrating Dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:06, Heiko Baums <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:16:46 -0200
>> And finally, yes, there are optdeps, but pacman don't handle them as
>> nicely it handles obligatory dependencies. If I install an optdep as
>> an explicit installed package, when I uninstall the other package,
>> the optdep will stay in my system. If I install it as a dependency,
>> pacman will list it as an unnecessary dependency when I run pacman
>> -Qdt.
>
> Well, this is a point which I'm missing, too, on Arch. This should
> indeed be fixed in pacman.
>
> Heiko
>

There are a few bugs on the tracker and some stuff on the wiki about
planned improvements. I think most people like that idea of supporting
it, someone just has to code it in.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux