Re: We need a maintained-by-TU chrome/chromium...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



hollunder@xxxxxx wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:42:40 -0200
"Guilherme M. Nogueira" <guilherme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Ionut Biru <biru.ionut@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

now is not the time. chromium doesn't have a stable release yet and
the build process kinda suck. 10gb space for compiling chromium is
something that cannot be forgot :)

--
Ionut

WOW! Really?!
I had no idea compiling chromium needed that much space.


One reason why I like Arch:
It's easy to stay close to upstream, to work with them, and to kick
butt if necessary.

Regards,
Philipp

I agree that we should have a TU-maintained build of chrome/chromium, but as Ionut pointed out the current build process is a little ridiculous. Once it has stabilized and matured a little bit more I will be happy to maintain it. My wife uses it religiously so I have a good incentive to keep it clean and current. :P


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux