On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Juan Diego <juantascon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I would be happy to maintain that package, but unfortunately Im not a TU > > dont you think archlinux should have something similar to ppa from > ubuntu so that it will be easier to maintain and promote personal > repositories, aur is a good option but if I would have to choose > between using a packages from aur or using a package from a personal > repository from somebody I wouldnt think it twice, I would choose the > personal repo one. > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:48, Hamo <hamo.by@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Dear Archlinux users, >>> Chrome is likely to be a daily-use web browser and with the Chrome OS >>> releasing,it will become more and more reliable.Archlinux is a >>> rolling-release distribution and it aims at being bleeding edge.So we >>> should have a maintained-by-TU chrome/chromium and it is really >>> useful... >>> >> If you're interested, I recommend finding a sponsor so that you can apply... >> >> There are lots of software projects that would be good to have, but it >> only makes sense to keep them in the repos if someone is interested in >> maintaining them. >> > 2 things. 1) You will chose the personal repo, but is not trusted, is under your risk, with AUR you have the option to see the source of the pkg!, that's why AUR ;), in the past trusted users had their own repos, then [community] was created. IMHO, there are repos with chromium packages, if you want the binary version of them instead the AUR PKGBUILD, then add those repos under your own risk ;). 2) No top-posting thanks. -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com
