Re: pam settings INSECURE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



2009/11/18 Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@xxxxxxxxx>:
> The *disadvantage* is that the devs/maintainers have to patch up-stream.
> This should be kept to a minimum, primarily to reduce their workload,
> and also because it is ASSUMED that if you use Arch, you're capable of
> doing the Right Thing (tm) according to your situation, or at least
> finding out how to.

If you would take the time to look at the packages that are involved
in this (namely shadow and kdebase-workspace), you'd see that both
/etc/pam.d/login and /etc/pam.d/kde are manually suplied alongside the
PKGBUILDs. So in this case, it's not "patching" but straight
"replacing" the "upstream".


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux