Re: archlinuxfr bad virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1 package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: archlinuxfr bad virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1 package
From: Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:47:36 +0800
In-reply-to: <68e6eac60911170557u660dbb1bk10b2f5d7bc47cf78@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 07:57 -0600, Dwight Schauer wrote:
> Yeah, as soon as I saw this redistribution discussion updated right
> away as I assumed it would soon be deleted.

Honestly, is it THAT hard to compile it from the AUR?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: archlinuxfr bad virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1 package
  - From: Dwight Schauer

References:
- archlinuxfr bad virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1 package
  - From: David C. Rankin
- Re: archlinuxfr bad virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1 package
  - From: tuxce
- Re: archlinuxfr bad virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1 package
  - From: Pierre Schmitz
- Re: archlinuxfr bad virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1 package
  - From: tuxce
- Re: archlinuxfr bad virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1 package
  - From: Dwight Schauer

Prev by Date: Re: First install of gnome on Arch, pretty cool... (new artwork this time :-)
Next by Date: Re: archlinuxfr bad virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1 package
Previous by thread: Re: archlinuxfr bad virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1 package
Next by thread: Re: archlinuxfr bad virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1 package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux