Re: google wave

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: google wave
From: Phillip Smith <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:31:50 +1100
In-reply-to: <20091101234623.GH22042@lynn>
Reply-to: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/11/2 Loui Chang <louipc.ist@xxxxxxxxx>

>
> I agree. It's pretty damned ridiculous.
> People on this list can't seem to take a hint.
>
>
Obviously not.... Seriously people:  arch-general != google-wave

References:
- Re: google wave
  - From: Roman Kyrylych
- Re: google wave
  - From: Ed Jobs
- Re: google wave
  - From: Laurie Clark-Michalek
- Re: google wave
  - From: Bobby
- Re: google wave
  - From: Giovanni Scafora
- Re: google wave
  - From: Celti
- Re: google wave
  - From: Franczen Attila
- Re: google wave
  - From: Trav
- Re: google wave
  - From: fons
- Re: google wave
  - From: Loui Chang

Prev by Date: Re: google wave
Next by Date: preferred laptops.
Previous by thread: Re: google wave
Next by thread: Re: google wave
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux