On Mo, 2009-10-19 at 23:03 +0200, Daniel Riedemann wrote: > I don't know if 6.6.38 build correctly, if you have a working PKGBUILD I > think everyone would be happy (since it is stable). But I don't know if that > is possible now since a higher version is already in the repos. That would > mean everybody has to force a downgrade? As we would provide new package names (something like boinc-client, boinc-manager, etc. this shouldn't be a problem at all. We could easily set a conflict flag. On Mo, 2009-10-19 at 23:03 +0200, Daniel Riedemann wrote: > I could help you writing the split package but I don't have much time this > week. I can't assure you anything ;o) It doesn't hurt that much, we could work it out the following week(s), it was just a general idea from me. On Mo, 2009-10-19 at 23:03 +0200, Daniel Riedemann wrote: > Sorry for being a bit off topic, but Jaroslav Lichtblau copied a bit from my > PKGBUILD and left the configure option --optimize in the PKGBUILD. Does the > current package work for you? Because --optimize breaks the standard makepkg > CFLAGS ... Or is "-ffast-math -O3" considered safe for offical builds? I'm not that kind of deep into the compiling thing, so without looking it up, I don't even know what this option exactly stands for ;). I guess this would be your part right then ;). I will contact you personally, so we can share our knowledge and work it out together ;). Anyone who wants to participate also, is free to contact us. -- Karol Babioch <karol@xxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
