On 5 Oct 2009 at 14:18, David Houston wrote: > > I like that it is bleeding edge but still it's not testing version. > > What is the function of Arch distro? For fun? > > > > Your kidding right? KISS.... I think that Arch functions really well at > being bleeding edge and stable.. further more.... your using aur. Not that > there is anything wrong with that but things break from time to time, I > would of put this down for a reason to distro hop. > > > > Will google for Rock Stable Arch. Thanks. > > > > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Enhancing_Arch_Linux_Stability > > > > Was thiking about PC-BSD. > > > > Thats a toy! Yes Arch functions great! But why I need always to fix something after Syu? It's just annoying. Really. As I said once before, I'm not a programmer or linux developer. I just need an OS which is working and it's stable. Nice, good. What I want to say is: Arch is bleading edge but there is a testing version as well right? So if I run testing version I can expect things not working, goes wrong and so on. Of course, with regular release I can expect the same, but not after each Syu, right? I'm using AUR and never had an issue with apps from AUR. Thanks for that link. Very useful. I got an idea to remove PHP completelly and to start over. Maybe it would work that way. I don't know. But I really had an issue with badly synced mirror. So, each time before Syu I need to update my mirrorlist as well :P What's wrong with PC-BSD? It's based on FreeBSD which is very good OS in my opinion. NetBSD is also great, but for servers. -- O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
