Re: Ruby and rubygems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Ruby and rubygems
From: Lars Tennstedt <oss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:42:50 +0200
In-reply-to: <4AB28F78.7050206@gmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090719)

Done

Biru Ionut wrote:

Lars Tennstedt wrote:
I guess it is not a good idea to report the bug because the package isflagged out of date. So I will wait a bit longer.
Greetings
Lars Tennstedt
report it. the maintainer will update and fix this issue as well.

References:
- Ruby and rubygems
  - From: Lars Tennstedt
- Re: Ruby and rubygems
  - From: Johannes Held
- Re: Ruby and rubygems
  - From: Lars Tennstedt
- Re: Ruby and rubygems
  - From: Lars Tennstedt
- Re: Ruby and rubygems
  - From: Johannes Held
- Re: Ruby and rubygems
  - From: Lars Tennstedt
- Re: Ruby and rubygems
  - From: Biru Ionut

Prev by Date: Re: Ruby and rubygems
Next by Date: crypto++ broken on arch? (unable to link)
Previous by thread: Re: Ruby and rubygems
Next by thread: crypto++ broken on arch? (unable to link)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux