Re: Stuff in /etc/cron.d/ won't work?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 07.09.2009 22:36, Allan McRae wrote:
> Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>> On 07.09.2009 04:30, Jozsef wrote:
>>  
>>> On Mon, 07 Sep 2009, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>> On 26.08.2009 05:37, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>>>>          
>>>>> On 26.08.2009 05:10, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>>>>                
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Sven-Hendrik
>>>>>> Haase<sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>                        
>>>>>>> On 25.08.2009 22:21, Nicolas Bigaouette wrote:
>>>>>>>                                
>>>>>>>> Would your script needs a shebang?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2009/8/25 Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                                        
>>>>>>>>> On 25.08.2009 12:51, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                                
>>>>>>>>>>> the crond log tells me that cron actually runs this command
>>>>>>>>>>> every
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                                                                 
>>>>>>>>>> minute without a problem
>>>>>>>>>> i think you mis-read your log. and it should tell you that
>>>>>>>>>> cron is
>>>>>>>>>> looking for changes in /etc/cron.d every minute.
>>>>>>>>>> may be, if you change you first * * * in your lol then may be
>>>>>>>>>> it will
>>>>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>>>>> assuming you're using the good cron. because fcron does not
>>>>>>>>>> support /etc/cron.d but there is other ways to achieve the
>>>>>>>>>> same thing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> check crond man page or its documentation
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                                                         
>>>>>>>>> I'm using dcron and also I didn't misread. Also, dcron doesn't
>>>>>>>>> look for
>>>>>>>>> changes in said directory without restarting from what I have
>>>>>>>>> found out.
>>>>>>>>> It actually tells me what it is going to execute and that is my
>>>>>>>>> /etc/cron.d/lol file. It would report and error otherwise. The
>>>>>>>>> thing
>>>>>>>>> that strikes me is that the command doesn't actually do
>>>>>>>>> anything. echo
>>>>>>>>> is a shell built-in of sh, bash, any shell really so env vars
>>>>>>>>> shouldn't
>>>>>>>>> be an issue.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                                                 
>>>>>>>>                                         
>>>>>>> No, stuff in /etc/cron.d/ looks just like stuff in your crontab
>>>>>>> and gets
>>>>>>> executed by the shell mentioned in $SHELL. Still, it wouldn't
>>>>>>> matter
>>>>>>> because I'm using a built-in here. I'm really baffled by this.
>>>>>>>                                 
>>>>>> For the record, I've always had issues with this myself. I
>>>>>> remedied it
>>>>>> by simply putting things in root's crontab, but that's not a proper
>>>>>> solution. If you can figure out how to get /etc/cron.d/ working
>>>>>> as it
>>>>>> should, I will love you forever
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         
>>>>> >From web searches, it appears that dcron's support for
>>>>> /etc/cron.d is
>>>>> somewhat wacky and not guaranteed to work. I think having a look at
>>>>> bcron might be worth it. Find it here:
>>>>> http://untroubled.org/bcron/ and
>>>>> find the AUR package here:
>>>>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6841.
>>>>> A somewhat old assessment of available cron daemons by bcron's author
>>>>> can be found here: http://untroubled.org/bcron/old/bcron_1.html.
>>>>> Out of interest, I just looked up what other distros use for their
>>>>> cron
>>>>> system and surprise! Ubuntu and Debian both use bcron and /etc/cron.d
>>>>> works alright.
>>>>> I shall hereby request changing Arch's default cron daemon to
>>>>> bcron in
>>>>> order to fix the /etc/cron.d issues, to make Arch seem more modern
>>>>> and
>>>>> to make Aaron love me forever (whatever it is that will subsequently
>>>>> happen from that).
>>>>>
>>>>>                 
>>>> I'd like to bring this up again. Changing the cron daemon to a more
>>>> modern one seems like a good idea to me.
>>>>           
>>> What is the more modern one?
>>>
>>>       
>> bcron is more modern crond as I mentioned before in the previous mail.
>> Find it at: http://untroubled.org/bcron/
>>   
>
> File a feature request on the bug tracker or this will be lost again.
>
> Allan
>
>
>
Ok, done: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16085


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux