On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 03:09:45PM +0200, Thijs Vermeir wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:42:36PM +0200, Thijs Vermeir wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:31:05PM +0200, Jan de Groot wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 18:06 +0200, Thijs Vermeir wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > First of all, I will change gstreamer to use the split package > > > possibilities that pacman 3.3 gives us. > > > Second, you can't relicense this to LGPL only, the cdparanoia plugin > > > links to cdparanoia, which is GPL. This makes the plugin GPL also. > > > > Apparently the GStreamer community asked [1] to cdparanoia developers to > > change the license to support LGPL, as this is the license used in > > core/base/good. This is from release 10.1 and we are using 10.2, so I > > think it is fine to say now that base is fully LGPL compatible now. > > > > [1] http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2008/08/07/cdparanoia-now-lgpl-v2/ > > Are you making any progress with the GStreamer packages ? Don't want > to put you under pressure :-) but there are some new upstream packages > that depend on the newer upstream gstreamer versions (like pitivi). Or > is it possible to have the unsplit updated packages like the ones I > send, until the new split packages are ready? ping again, The number of packages depending on newer gstreamer is rising (like: gnome-dvb-daemon in aur).
