Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] udev-145-1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Dan McGee wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Gerardo Exequiel
Pozzi<vmlinuz386@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:

Tobias Powalowski wrote:


Hi
bump to latest udev version, please test it well.
Has many new things included, which also dig in glib2 and libusb depend.

greetings
tpowa



Sign-off both i686, x86_64.

All boot OK, (custom kernel no initrd) no special setups, like raid or
lvm. My usb devices are with the correct perms (4-in-1 reader, pendrive,
ipod, mp3 player). The firmware for my printer is loaded OK, and kvm-88
still boot both arches (Arch Linux kernel):)


One sidenote, this version support ACL, so I guess that is better now to
switch /dev from ramfs to tmpfs in initscripts. (the current udev
documentation talks about tmpfs not ramfs)



By the way, doing this also will help, at least in one step, this
feature request (FS#15612 - better support for selinux) [#1]

[#1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15612


I filled a FS [#1] with the patch

Sidenote2: This udev bump from minimal kernel version from 2.6.22 to
2.6.25 (mandatory) because use the signalfd(). An announce required?

Wowzers, I'm not so sure we want to do that. We just got scared with
glibc from going past 2.6.18, this is a rather significant jump (and I
know my current Xen kernel is .24).

Is there a way to build udev without requiring this call? The discussions with the minimal kernel version for our glibc did not even venture beyond the .24 version...

Allan





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux