Re: Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



bardo schrieb:
2009/7/15 bardo <ilbardo@xxxxxxxxx>:
Yes, i686, but just to be sure I checked on both arches, and I get the
new version.

The problem has been solved by switching repos. Could it be that
mldonkey just linked to libjpeg.so, and readelf recurred to
libjpeg.so.62, while the program said it didn't find the library
because the internal offset was for another version?


What readelf said is what is written in the binary. If the binary says libjpeg.so.62, then it's an old binary!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux