Re: Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



2009/7/15 bardo <ilbardo@xxxxxxxxx>:
> The package was created with makechrootpkg in a clean chroot. How is
> it even possible to link with two different versions of the same
> library? And where did it get the old version, since it didn't exist
> in the chroot?

I may start to understand... The command I posted was from a vitual
machine that I didn't fully upgrade, I just fired it up to check a
user claim of the problem. So... it seems that ldd reports shared
libraries for dependencies, and there was something not fully upgraded
that still looked for libjpeg.so.62: after a full upgrade of the
system the problem disappeared. Is that possible?

Corrado


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux