On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 05:32, Magnus Therning<magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ed Jobs<oloringr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Monday 13 July 2009 11:49, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: >>> to the dev: >>> why not rename vi package to nvi ? >> >> +1 to that > > Sounds like a good idea, especially since nvi _isn't_ vi in the strictest sense. > Neither is vim. To my understanding, nvi emulates original vi more closely than the old vi package.
