Re: Are base packages assumed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Zé Ninguém schrieb:
Hi there.

I was wondering if base or base-devel packages should go in a package
dependency list or not?
What is the current policy about that?
I noticed that the instructions to build a clean chroot tell to install
base, base-devel and sudo, but does that means the package should be
expecting them in a user system?

I recommend putting all dependencies in depends (including base packages), as direct dependencies are used by pacman to order updates - i.e. a package is upgraded after all of its dependencies. This sometimes avoids weird race condition on updates.

However, we usually do not put packages from base-devel into makedepends, although it doesn't hurt to do so. If you build anything from our repositories, make sure you always have base-devel installed. I wouldn't consider a missing makedepend on pkgconfig a bug, but a missing makedepend on anything not in base-devel is definitely a bug.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux