On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis<grbzks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Caleb Cushing<xenoterracide@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> been using arch for a few months and generally good and current... but >> I just noticed that it still hasn't moved to bash 4. I'm wondering >> what the status of it is? and where it's being held up (searching the >> bugtracker found nothing that looked on target). perhaps I can help? >> >> -- >> Caleb Cushing >> >> http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com >> > > http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-February/010357.html Blame me for this - I've been sucking at this. The time I get to actually do the rebuilds isn't enough to keep up with the ever-changing package versions for everything in extra. Initially, however, bash 4.0 broke mkinitcpio, making unbootable machines, so I held off for a bit. I think I'm going to just put the core packages in testing and get some help with the extra packages. Feel free to email me personally and yell if I don't at least get some of this in testing by tonight.
