On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 16:43 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Baho Utot<baho-utot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 10:28 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Baho Utot<baho-utot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 12:20 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Baho Utot<baho-utot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > >> >> >> Baho Utot wrote: > >> >> >> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:46 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> Baho Utot wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> I have setup a new computer with a clean install with > >> >> >> >>> kernel26-2.6.29.4-1 does this kernel support unionfs? > >> >> >> >>> This is the second system I have had trouble with. > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Devtools always complains like this > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> building union chroot > >> >> >> >>> ERROR: No unionfs available. Abandon ship! > >> >> >> >>> FAILURE: vsftpd-2.1.0-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> I am using devtools 0.6.4-1 the latest I think > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> When I use devtools with kernel26 2.6.27.10-1 on an older system > >> >> >> >>> devtools works > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Anyone got a clue what is wrong? > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> The same as previously... recent kernels do no support unionfs so you > >> >> >> >> need a git version of makechrootpkg with fixes it to use unionfs. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Allan > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Can you tell Aaron I found an error with his latest git version of > >> >> >> > devtools the makechrootpkg > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > devtools-360fcd2f0ecaba3c8bb0e56e7fc6014dacfb3ec7 > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > line 227 on the version I just fetched > >> >> >> > near the bottom of the script (makechrootpkg) > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > is > >> >> >> > pkgfile=${chrootdir}/union/pkgdest/${pkgname}-${pkgver}-${pkgrel}-* > >> >> >> > ${PKGEXT} > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > should be > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > pkgfile=${chrootdir}/rw/pkgdest/${pkgname}-${pkgver}-${pkgrel}-* > >> >> >> > ${PKGEXT} > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > It fails to copy the completed/built package from the chroot to the > >> >> >> > directory where you have the PKGBUILD file > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I have no problems, and if you think about it, the union dir is a union > >> >> >> between the root and rw directories so this is the same thing... > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Allan > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > Then why doesn't it work? > >> >> > > >> >> > The package is left in rw/pkgdest > >> >> > after I change it the package is moved to the dir the PKGBUILD is in. > >> >> > >> >> The only reason it wouldn't work is that rw and union are _not_ the > >> >> same at that point in time. > >> > > >> > Don't understand what you are saying there??? > >> > > >> > Then my fix it is OK? > >> > > >> > I understand the rw overlays ../root what does the union do? > >> > >> root is read-only > >> rw is read-write > >> union is used to combine the two (to mount anything, you need a destination dir) > >> > >> So, root + rw = union > > > > Pk but that adds to the mystery why the compiled packages is missing in > > union and present in rw > > My guess is that the union failed to mount, and the script carries on > just fine as if rw and union were normal dirs. Ok I'll have to check that