On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 00:51 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote: > On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 18:46 -0400, Baho Utot wrote: > > > I have encountered many packages in extra that don't compile with > > gcc-4.4.0. The easy way to fix them is to compile them with gcc-3.4 > > The easy way to fix them is by reporting bugs. Bugfixing most of these > packages is very easy and takes us only a few minutes to fix, so why > bother supporting an old outdated compiler that hasn't been supported > upstream for a long while? > Do you really want a list of all the packages in extra that are broke? There are lots of them
