Douglas Soares de Andrade wrote: > Em Domingo 31 Maio 2009, às 09:37:27, Firmicus escreveu: > >>> Succeeded now. >>> (Thanks in good part to Gerardo who made me realize that the javac >>> binary was unable to find libjli.so, even though it was where it should >>> be. Symlinking to /usr/lib solved the problem. So this was some LIBPATH >>> problem in my supposedly pristine chroot.) >>> >> Dammit!!! My new package happens to have the same GD problem Douglas >> originally had: see FS#14738 >> >> Folks, I am no longer sure to understand the subtleties of "building in >> a clean chroot" ... >> >> Now that I know that this package belongs to Douglas, I'll happily let >> him deal with it ;D >> >> On the other hand, I'd be grateful to be a bit more enlightened about >> all this. Has anyone experienced any similar issues whilst building >> packages in a chroot? >> > > Me too, till then i will build packages in my working enviroment, i really did > not understood why the package buillt in the chroot had problems, any ideas ? > > Thanks > > > The FIX is currently in the bugtracker, patch agains the svn trunk. The explication is in the comments. (My fault) http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14738#comment44808 -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D