On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 01:54:45AM +0200, Johannes Held wrote: > Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@xxxxxxxxx>: > > I don't really see how this is needed. If a user updates package X > > which he knows is running a daemon, it's not hard to know whether or > > not it should be restarted. We should always assume the user is > > competant > Yes, that's right. But it would fix the problem of "should every daemon of this > package be restarted or not?". > > If the user stopped a deamon, he would say "no" to the question and the deamon > will remain stopped. > I don't see the issue you refer to as "problem". If you are serious about it: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=summary Its a pacman issue. -- Greg
Attachment:
pgpsvIQeTLCGV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
