Re: New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires intervention

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 08:50:02PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
> > And a quick guess, it looks like the new vim package puts its colors here:
> > /usr/share/vim/vim72/colors/
> >
> > Any reason the old /usr/share/vim/ shouldn't be on the default runtimepath?
> 
> Addendum: *any* plugins installed do not work, not just colors or
> anything else. vim-bufexplorer is broken; vim-taglist is broken, etc.
> 

Add this line to ~/.vimrc:
set runtimepath+=/usr/share/vim

In the default vim configuration the main directory for runtime files is
the one where vim installs its files, /usr/share/vim/vim72 in the new
package, /usr/share/vim/ before the split vi/vim/gvim.
See the help for :runtimepath, $VIMRUNTIME and $VIM.

The plugins packages need a repackaging.

There is already a bug report http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14626.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux